You know, you are kind of moving the goalpost here, A LOT.
You started out, insisting that TRump has a very, very, very misogyistic view of women, (ie grab em by the pussy, or nasty).
Do I think that as Trump ran his pageants, and "made sure things were good" that he appreciated how good looking some of the girls were?
Sure. Indeed, I kind of hope so. It would be sad if he was so overexposed to it, as part of the job, that he stopped being able to appreciate good looking women.
You talk about Trump "lying".
Let's look at this for likely lies.
Trump clearly, is about image and status. His grandiouse houses, marry models, sleeping with porn stars, becoming PRESIDENT, ect.
You think that he wouldn't play to his audience and exaggerate something that was ... a really minor issue, such as working around naked women, to play to the fantasy of men, that THEY don't get to see behind the scenes, but TRUMP does?
So, no, in this case I don't think he was "LYING", i do think he was not being completely truthful.
But, regardless, nothing about this supports your assertion that he thinks of women as either groupies or nasty.
So, to summarize, you have to support your claim, him mentioning groupies ONCE, behind closed doors, and him mentioning that he worked among a lot of naked girls.
That's a pretty weak base to build an attack.
Of course, unless you don't care about how weak your attack is, you just want to throw shit.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
14 days ago
Where did I move the goalposts? Yes, I started out as claiming Trump has a very misogynistic view of women. And there I stayed. I have not altered my opinion of Trump.
I was asking you, if you thought Trump was lying. I did not make a definite claim that Trump was lying in this case.
I attack and I throw shit at Trump. Cry me a river.
Which porn stars has Trump claimed to have slept with?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
14 days ago
Noting and appreciating attractive, naked women is not misogynistic.
Your supporting argument, does not support your conclusion.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
14 days ago
When Trump notes women by saying he "went at her like a bitch" and "grabbed them by the pussy", it is misogynistic.
Which porn stars has Trump claimed to have slept with?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
14 days ago
It's actually not. He claimed to hit on a certain woman aggressively and he said that groupies let you be aggressive ie, "grab them by the pussy".
That's not misogynistic. It's CRUDE, but it makes no comment on women being less than men.
You're repeating some crude comments, and trying to by emotional about them, to create the illusion that they mean something.
BTW, it is also worth noting, that you talk about TRump lying, yet you are taking at face value his words, when he is bragging to younger men about his sexual history.
From my personal experience with men, that is the time to give their words the LEAST credibility.
BUT, these crude comments, are useful to you, so suddenly, you are as trusting as a small child.
Can you be any more obviously self serving?
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
14 days ago
Trump is just like some other rapists, they claim their victim wanted to be raped. You need to stop falling for his BS.
Trump thinks those comments mean something or he would not have said them.
Remember, I'm asking you if you think Trump was lying. How long are you going to pretend I said something else?
Which porn stars has Trump claimed to have slept with?
I'm not self-serving.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
14 days ago
"Other rapists"? LOL. You are just here to spam neg talking points aren't you?
My point stands. YOur supporting argument, doesn't support your argument. You structured your sentences as though it did, but it...didn't.
YOu didn't address that in your response. You just spammed more shit and reasserted your neg points.
Did you develope this style yourself, or were you trained?
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
14 days ago
Yes, other rapists. Trump is a rapist. What part of the court's decision did you not understand? Not only is Trump a rapist, he is a proud rapist. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/
[–] Corbell (8437) 9 hours ago
Trump clearly, is about image and status. His grandiouse houses, marry models, sleeping with porn stars, becoming PRESIDENT, ect.
You going to support your claim that Trump sleeps with porn stars? Why would this be an image he wants anyway?
Ohhhh, I was wondering how long it might take you to fall back on that old trope that I was trained to attack Trump or others on obscure little forums like this one.
Attacking people I don't like on forums is merely my pleasure. You're welcome.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
14 days ago
Listen SPAM boy, if you run into a lot of people that think you are a trained lefty hack, that might say something more about YOU, than it does us.
IN the real world, Trump was a fairly mainstream President with an odd even crude style,
BUT, the hysterical reaction from his enemies, is more a factor of THEM being completely insane radicals, then anything wrong with him.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
14 days ago
I don't run in to a lot of people who think I'm a "trained lefty hack". You are the only one who says that of me. A few others here call me a lefty, but I'm not.
Gun grabs are not mainstream, neither is using the Secret Service to line one's pockets like Trump did. Sleeping with porn actresses is mainstream now?
I'm not the one under indictment, that would be Trump, the insane radical rapist and gun grabber.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
14 days ago
1. Oh, I must have misunderstood what you meant when you whined about people thinking that about you.
2. LOL. gun grabs. Sure, that's what is bothering you.
3. Spammer. GOt it.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
14 days ago
So you're one of those who is happy to see Trump violating our 2nd Amendment rights?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
14 days ago
I know that anyone who is serious about the second Amendment, knows that tearing down the republicans is not the way to go.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
13 days ago
You are correct. Tearing down the GOP and the 2nd Amendment is a very bad policy for Trump to have.
But unfortunately, most MAGA care more about supporting Trump's anti-gun agenda than their own civil rights.
Most of the Trump supporters I have talked to about Trump's anti-gun agenda deny that it exists, that Trump had to ban bump stocks, the ATF went rogue, Biden did it, or some other stupid BS. Prior to 2018, I never heard any Republican using the typical Democrat anti-gun BS that Trump supporters are using now. Anything to deny that Trump is an anti-gun zealot.
Gun confiscation without due process. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxgybgEKHHI
Trump gun grab. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2018-12-26/pdf/2018-27763.pdf
Forced reset triggers. https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/open-letter/all-ffls-mar-2022-open-letter-forced-reset-triggers-frts/download
Trump probably grabbed more bump stocks than Biden did forced reset triggers. That is a poor reputation to have.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
13 days ago
Your refusal to be serious is noted.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
13 days ago
So which tactic are you using to deny that Trump is an anti-gun zealot?
Is it "there was no gun grab"? Or perhaps is it "no one should own those kinds of guns anyway"?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
13 days ago
My "tactic" is considering the absolute bat shit craziness and gun control coming from the dems,
I can't take your pretense of being against Trump because of gun rights, seriously.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
13 days ago
Gun grabs are crazy no matter who does them. It doesn't matter if it is Trump or Biden.
So you're saying a gun grab is okay when Trump does it?
What do you think of Trump's proposed gun confiscation without due process scam?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
13 days ago
Putting some pressure on republicans, especially Country CLub republicans is fine.
But, your anti-Trump passion, just doesn't ring true.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
13 days ago
You're being evasive. Do you agree with the Trump anti-gun agenda or not?
Being pro-civil rights always rings true. Why does it seem that you are so eager to dismiss any civil right that Trump does not like?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. I oppose gun control.
2. I've explained my postion completely. Stop asking questions and address it. Or if you have nothing more to say, stop talking.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
12 days ago
How can you support Trump if you oppose gun control? Trump is a gun grabber and has pushed for red flag laws without due process.
Your position makes no sense. How is a anti-gun president going to protect your 2nd amendment rights?
There, I addressed your nonsensical position on gun control.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
Voting biden is voting for national suicide. Voting Trump is voting for sanity.
He's far from perfect, but at least he isn't a suicidal leftard.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
12 days ago
Opposing Biden is not the same as opposing gun grabs.
If having Biden in office is suicide, then why is the country still functioning, and in some ways, better than it was while Trump was president?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
Who you voting for, Mr Supposed Gun Rights Guy?
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
12 days ago
Neither Biden or Trump are "Mr. Gun Rights Guy". What will it take to get you to understand that basic fact?
If having Biden in office is suicide, then why is the country still functioning, and in some ways, better than it was while Trump was president?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
who are you voting for?
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
12 days ago
My WA ballot will have many politicians in various elections and other measures on it.
I will not be voting for either Biden or Trump in November.
I will probably vote libertarian.
You're being very evasive. If having Biden in office is suicide, then why is the country still functioning, and in some ways, better than it was while Trump was president?
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
13 days ago
It doesn't matter if that's his reason for being against Trump. The fact that you don't acknowledge that being a failure on Trump's end is telling of you as a person. If that was Biden who did that you wouldn't let it go. If it's your guys it's perfectly fine. I think it's bullshit no matter if it is Biden's stupid ass or not.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
13 days ago
If it were Biden, I wouldn't even mention it.
It's the flip side of the same coin.
THe left has become the party of national self harm.
So, a relatively minor issue on guns, just doesn't matter, on either side.
If Biden came down on the RIGHT side of this issue, I wouldn't care. Because of the overall evilness and maddness of the left.
Ditto, if Trump is on teh wrong side. I might not like it, but it doesn't matter, becasue Trump might be wrong on this issue, but he is not evil or insane, nor, hates me and is actively working to hurt me and mine.
So, that's my take on it.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
13 days ago
Yeah I don't believe you.
Basically well yeah but the left is worse. Rather than call out the corruption you justify it by pointing how the left is worse in your eyes. Rather pathetic way to look at things. That makes your credibility take a huge hit.
So how about I point out how the right is worse anytime you point out flaws of the left? Same logic right? Would you accept that?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
13 days ago
1. This isn't corruption, it's a bad policy.
2. Which is it? Do you not believe that this is the way I look at things, or do you think it is pathetic that I look at things this way? YOu dont' get to have both, you stupid fag.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
13 days ago
No it's corruption..
I don't believe you would do the same for Biden. That's clear idiot.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
13 days ago
1. Fucking moron, how the fuck do you figure that.
2. So, if you don't believe me when I say that that is how I view it, and operate, then why did you call me pathetic for seeing things that way and operating that way?
Seems that you are quite the shit talker.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
13 days ago
No one would support that policy who isn't corrupt.
Because either way it's bullshit.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
13 days ago
1. Because no one could possibly disagree with you? Ok. I believe that you are that fucking stupid.
2. But you did both. YOu posted one answer and then IMMEDIATELY posted as though you believed the other. And you still don't see, CAN'T see the problem.
Leftards have lost the ability to think.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
13 days ago
Fair warning corbell is ok with corruption so long as it's Trump doing it.
reply
share
Ranb (7405)
13 days ago
Yeah, the typical trumper if just fine with anything Trump does. They think if anyone else does it, it is bad. :)
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
13 days ago
Funny then why don't you grant people this liberty who disagree with you? The minute you find out some is liberal you say they are evil. How about immigration? Anybody who disagreed with you, you consider evil. Fuck off.
Either way we go with you are full of shit. That's the point I was making.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
13 days ago
1. No, when someone reveals themselves to be soulless trolls, is when I say that they are evil. That so many lefards devolve into trolls, is a you problem. YOu plural, before you even start playing retard.
2. Nope. You said nothing like that. YOu stated BOTH, contradictory ideas with complete certainty. Such lack of rational thinking, is common with lefties.
Anyone that thinks I am being harsh, can scroll up and check it out themselves.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
13 days ago
Nope you insult people right off the bat. I've seen it you lying sack of shit.
Yep I did. Either way we go with you are full of shit. You got schooled again. Let's keep going shitting on you is fun for me. You are human trash.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. No, I don't. YOu are a lying whore.
2. And still, you can't see the problem. Leftards have lost the ability to think.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Yes you do you lying piece of filth! Within a couple exchanges on here you threw out an insult about liberals. In true 14 year old fashion you immediately jump to the oh so eloquent word leftard. I have you on record insulting first. Don't bullshit us it destroys your credibility even more. Not that you had any to begin with.
Says the guy who claimed assuming and questioning were the same. That's rich!
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. No, I don't. You are just spewing shit talk.
2. In that context, they were. YOu had, and are still having a hissy fit over semantics to avoid any real issues. Becasue on some level, you know that you are on the wrong side and that rhetorical games (the more dishonest the better) is your only hope of presenting the APPEARENCE of making a valid argument for your position.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Yes you do. Remember you are on record doing it.
Nope they were not. Conservatives lack the ability to think. Studies have shown this. Assuming and questioning are not the same, the point stands.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. No, I don't. YOu are lying.
2. Yes, they were. I was describing a varied group with a spectrum of questioning/assuming about certain black assholes. YOu latched on to normal word usage to have a hissy fit, so as to do the woke tactic of using manufactured outrage as an argument. Classic leftard bullshit.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Yep you are on record doing it. Also telling people to kill themselves. You doing that immediately removed your right to preach about religion. No true Christian would pull that. And no it's not brave or courageous. To wish that is cowardly.
Nope they were not the same. The meaning of questioning and assuming are completely different. Look up the definition and get back to me dumbass. Please graduate from middle school you reject moron. Conservatives have been shown on studies that they can't think properly. I think it's a disease.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. Shove your shit talk up your ass.
2. I like the way that you are pretending to be too stupid to understand the context of the issue. I don't think you are as stupid as you pretend to be. But, you are certainly not nearly as clever as you think you are.
All you really have, is a lack of shame, to keep up your shit talk, even when it is clear that I am not being fooled.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
You can't speak against facts. Your lies are dismissed.
Oh I'm far smarter than you are. Read up the definition of each word dumbass. Conservatives have been shown on studies to be ignorant.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. You are the one lying.
2. You fixated on a non-issue, to have a hissy fit to derail the discussion. Standard lefty tactic when they know they have lost a debate.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Nope you are lying. I have you on record.
Nope I stood for what the word actually means. Conservatives don't know what a dictionary is apparently.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. YOu are lying.
2. You pretended to be too stupid to get the context, and derailed the thread because your postion on the issue was retarded.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Nope soon I will provide the link.
The point stands the word means different things. The dictionary is my proof.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. I predict that the link will NOT show what you claim it will show, but that you will just insist that it does and hold to your lie like the shameless, soulless troll boi that you are.
2. We were discussing a group of people with a spectrum of varying hostility to certain black assholes.
You lost the debate, your position on the issue revealed you to be a racist asshole, so you manufactured a... hissy fit over a minor issue of wording.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Oh no it will show you in all your stupid glory trust me.
Nope. We were arguing about the difference of what it meant. Assuming and questioning are not the same the point stands bitch.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. I take you're looking? FInding time after time that I didn't call someone a name until they earned it? Your plan is to not mention all those times, and keep looking till you find one where it looks like I went hard FIRST?
2. In that case it did. And you know it. YOu are just having a hissy fit, like a hysterical woman, to avoid admitting it.
reply
share
SamNoyoun (4519)
11 days ago
Jesus, dude! Fifty comments in a single day? Take a break, leave the basement and go outside in the sunshine...
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
https://moviechat.org/nm0874339/Donald-Trump/657058f413ede1507ec2a912/Here-are-the-top-moments-from-Trumps-Hannity-town-hall?reply=65745d58403ae64f1a6a7daa
During that exchange you insulted first. This is where you will deny insulting me and attempt to bullshit your way out of it. Conservatives have a hard time being honest.
Nope even in that context it isn't the same. You got caught lying. Get educated you degenerate piece of trash.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
"INsulted first"? Classic troll boi move. YOu try to pretend that since you didn't overtly insult me, that my insult was "first" and thus I am the "bad guy".
But, you claimed that I insulted people, just because they disagreed with me, or hte moment I learned that they were liberal.
THat is clearly not the case here. We have quite a number of back and forth posts where it is clear that you are a leftard who is disagreeing with me.
and to further drive the point home, in my "first insult", I fully explain your asshole behavior that earned you the insult.
And here it is.
"Thus, the two situations are completely different. That is why I judge them differently.
Your dismissing my already explained reasoning and just asserting that it was partisan bias, was kind of a dick move on your part."
And I was right, it was a dick move on your part, thus, making you a dick.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
You dismiss liberals before hearing their reason. Do yeah nope bullshit. In the real world you are the asshole.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
And instead of having teh balls to admit that you failed to support your claim, you must make another claim.
That is asshole behavior. A good man would admit that he could not find an example of my insulting someone just because they "disagreed" with me, or I found out they are a liberal.
Which was what you initially claimed.
But, you're not a good man. YOU are the asshole here.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Oh you insulted first. Before I called you partisan you were rude to me.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. Irrelevant. You failed to support your claim but you are too much of a pussy to admit that.
2. You earned that insult. THe way that you expect to behave like a complete cunt and be treated with a civility you don't deserve? That is you not understanding how to be a good person.
3. I didn't insult you because you called me partisan. I explained at the time why I insulted you. Try to be a bit less fucking stupid.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Um nope. I provided proof of you insulting first.
No I didn't. You justified telling someone to kill themselves. You can't be trusted. Which shows you will justify anything that you can here.
Bullshit. You telling someone to kill themselves is violating the sites rules. Typical though conservatives don't typically read over the fine print of anything. Conservatives tend to be less intelligent on average.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. Which was NOT what you accused me of. BUt you don't have the balls to admit that. Pussy.
2. Yes, you did earn that insult. YOu behaved like a complete asshole. The other poster also earned his insults. Your desire for yourself and people like you, to be complete assholes while getting treated with respect, is a serious personality flaw.
3. I didn't insult you because you called me partisan. I explained at the time why I insulted you. Try to be a bit less fucking stupid.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
It was actually. You then moved the goal post. You said you earned that insult. So yeah you did insult first.
Nope telling someone to kill themselves even if they are an asshole is not warranted. I don't ever want to hear you preach about God after pulling that stunt. I've never told anyone to kill themselves. I'm not trash like you are. You also threatened to get in my face if we met. Which is illegal. And trust me that's a mistake you would learn from if you pulled that move.
Yeah you did. You lying piece of filth. Conservatives need to seek help it's seriously concerning the moves you guys pull. First the January 6th riot, sandy hook hoax, litter boxes in classrooms hoax, supporting the drug war etc. All disgusting behavior which you are guilty of.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
You're boring me Grift.
All you are doing now is spewing the same stupid shit in a circle pattern.
Do you have anything of value to say about anything?
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
I'm all for an honest debate. Don't deceive or lie and we will be good. Want to back it up?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
Dude. YOu are a lying whore.
You know, I do have something more to say.
Your behavior with your own link?
Validates the way I refuse to provide links to know troll bois.
Your own link proved that you were wrong and you just lied and stood by it, because you are just a vile little troll.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
You are boring me corbell. Want to save face and start over? Or continue being a little bitch?
You don't provide evidence for anything. You just lied again.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
YOu provided the evidence, and it proved you wrong.
And all you did was lie about that, and stonewall.
THus, validating my past refusals to provide links.
You soulless people aren't worth the time it takes to google something and to cut and paste it.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
How? I said you insulted me first. That post proved that.
No you never provide shit. It's an excuse so you don't backup a claim. Remember when I backed up a claim about cops when you said I wouldn't?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
Nope. You said that I insulted people simply for disagreeing with me, or when I found out that they were liberals.
Your link proved that to be wrong.
Instead of having the balls to admit that, you moved the goal posts and just lied like the little bitch that you are.
Thus proving my point. All requests from leftard troll bois, are fake and should be ignored. They are not worth the effort.
YOu are scum of the earth.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
And you do. Want me to provide that link also? Ok so I didn't specifically provide you insulting liberals. So in that case you get a small victory. However I can provide you insulting liberals from the jump want that link?
No you need to be out in your place scumbag. Have the balls to admit when you are wrong. I can as seen above. I misspoke you happy?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
You've done enough. I would not ask you to waste any more of your time,
after all, you will just lie about what the link shows anyways.
I don't care about a mispeaking. I'm not even sure what you are talking about. And I don't care.
What I care about is that you set one goal, and when you discovered that you could not support that, instead of admitting you were wrong, you moved the goal posts.
Thus proving yourself to be a troll boi.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Let's see if you are as man as I am. Have you ever been proven wrong on here? I will give you that one. Have you ever been proven wrong on here?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
I think so.
I don't have the brittle...mind armor against any new information that you lefties do, so, it's not traumatic for me. I vaguely recall admitting it, adjusting my view of hte situation and moving on.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
No more stuff about lefties. I can lob insults at conservatives as well. You do have Alex Jones a serious scumbag. Should I lump you with him? Are all conservatives smart people?
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
yeah, sorry. THe weird...lockstep suicide thing you guys have going on, is cleary insanely important and dangerous.
I'm not going to NOT comment on it.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Ok and I will bring up a conservative fact which paints the group negatively. All facts. We can go tit for tat.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Conservatives are scary as well bud. They have just as many demons in the closet.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
1. No, we're not.
2. NO, we don't.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Yes you are. And yes you guys do. Want me to start peeling the onion for you? Let's start off with Alex Jones. What he did was rather disturbing and scary. He represents your party.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
No, he doesn't. That is a retarded thing to say.
In what way is the a reflection of my behavior?
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Yeah he does, he is part of your group. You guys are a collective group. You are all guilty by association. He said Sandy Hook was a hoax and when asked to provide evidence didn't do so. Sounds familiar to me. Sounds like another person who wants people not to questions their claims.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
We are not a mindless bunch of dolts the way you lefties are.
YOur ignoring your sides' bad behavior, or projection it, both are just you being an asshole.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Oh yeah you are. Any group who listens to Alex Jones is exactly that.
No I call out the lefts side. Rioting is wrong as Biden is a corrupt piece of shit. Thing is I'm not willing to look the other way on conservatives corruption where as you are.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
No, we are not. YOu are just talking shit.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
12 days ago
Funny you do this to liberals but don't like it flipped on you interesting.
reply
share
Corbell (8788)
12 days ago
Remember how certain you were that I insulted people just for disagreeing with me, and/or when I found out that they were liberals?
Remember how many times I told you that that was not true and you were completely certain that I was lying, and you wouldn't hear or consider for a second any words that contradicted what you were so certain about?
And then you went looking for proof, and found out that everything I said in that instance was completely correct?
Here is what a human being would learn from that.
1. YOU need to be less certain, especially when it comes to judging people you hate. Because you suck at it.
2. i'm an honest person. I am not a shit talker.
reply
share
Grifterhunter (709)
11 days ago
Oh no I can still provide that actually. Remember when I said would you like that link and you said I don't care? So let me ask again would you like that link? I do in fact have you on record saying partisan zealot with someone debating you the moment they disagreed. https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/608b4d6db7f9bb01c6056b90/64-GDP-Thanks-Biden?reply=608c375cf94f4c712cadebd8
You deny saying partisan zealot here and I won't provide another link. You insulted first.
I'm certain you have insulted people for disagreeing with you. I have you on record telling someone to kill themselves also. Do you deny that?
No you are a lying piece of shit who deserves negativity in your life.
reply
share