MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > The obsession with brands

The obsession with brands


We're consumers. We are by-products of a lifestyle obsession. Murder, crime, poverty, these things don't concern me. What concerns me are celebrity magazines, television with 500 channels, some guy's name on my underwear. Rogaine, Viagra, Olestra...

Some of you just want to fit in. You have to be using a product like iPad and iPhone, otherwise you are not cool. Your furniture has to be bough from IKEA. Your daily coffee has to be from Starbucks. You have to visit Disney once in your life. You have to watch Oscars. You have to like certain celebrities. You have to enjoy a specific genre of music to fit on. You must have a facebook and a linkedin. If you are not a tumblr or a reddit user, you don't fit in. It just goes on and on. The infamous Cult of Mac spans far and wide, with a deep obsession with anything and everything Apple. Starbucks blankets America, driving endless droves of coffee-lovers to its baristas. Whole Foods fans swear by the huge supermarket chain's pesticide free cantaloupes.

This is taught in your class rooms :


Throughout the course of human history, poverty has been the rule, riches
the exception. Societies in the past were called affluent when their ruling
classes lived in abundance and luxury. Even in the rich countries of the
past, the great majority of people struggled for mere subsistence. Today in
this country minimum standards of nutrition, housing, and clothing are
assured, not for all, but for the majority. Beyond these minimum needs,
such former luxuries as homeownership, durable goods, travel, recreation,
and entertainment are no longer restricted to a few
.


A society of mass consumption is contrary to a society of mass poverty. In a society of mass poverty, the average level of consumption is low, and most of the people consume a small amount of goods


WHAT A LOAD OF CRAP ^^


Within the current economic system of "perpetual growth", we risk being locked into a mode of development that is:

destructive, in the long run, to the environment
a contributing factor to poverty around the world
a contributing factor to hunger amongst such immense wealth
and numerous other social and ecological problems

As consumption increases, the resource base has to expand to meet growth and related demands. If the resource base expands to other people’s lands, then those people don’t necessarily get to use those resources either. You rape their resources. Just look at the phoney Iraq War.


Junk-food chains, including KFC and Pizza Hut, are under attack from major environmental groups in the United States and other developed countries because of their environmental impact. Intensive breeding of livestock and poultry for such restaurants leads to deforestation, land degradation, and contamination of water sources and other natural resources. For every pound of red meat, poultry, eggs, and milk produced, farm fields lose about five pounds of irreplaceable top soil. The water necessary for meat breeding comes to about 190 gallons per animal per day, or ten times what a normal Indian family is supposed to use in one day, if it gets water at all.

Overall, animal farms use nearly 40 percent of the world’s total grain production. In the United States, nearly 70 percent of grain production is fed to livestock.

Food is a commodity.
Much of the best agricultural land in the world is used to grow commodities such as cotton, sisal, tea, tobacco, sugar cane, and cocoa, items which are non-food products or are marginally nutritious, but for which there is a large market.
Millions of acres of potentially productive farmland is used to pasture cattle, an extremely inefficient use of land, water and energy, but one for which there is a market in wealthy countries.
More than half the grain grown in the United States (requiring half the water used in the U.S.) is fed to livestock, grain that would feed far more people than would the livestock to which it is fed.


society has gone opposite of fight club. People want that six pack, anyone and everyone now can be a rockstar or celebrity thanks to youtube. Millenials lost generation would kill to have a boring office job. Ikea is now more popular than ever, amazon sales through the roof, everybody needs a smartphone.


Consumerism: The things you own, end up owning you

reply

Deep, man. Real deep. 😎👍🏻

Personally, I try to avoid brands and fads as much as possible. I don't have a Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, Instagram, or Reddit. I don't eat much fast food, or meat in general. I don't care what company made my clothes, although I would prefer it wasn't slave labor-- but that's hard to tell sometimes. I didn't have a smartphone until this year. 😇

However, I do have an iPad and an iPhone. I love Disney and visit every year. I recently got hooked on going to Dunkin' Donunts a few times a week. I watch Game of Thrones.

I do fear for humanity sometimes. My generation specifically astounds me with its stupidity. But there is hope. 😔😌

reply

" My generation specifically astounds me with its stupidity."

Leia, I'd have guessed you to be within MY generation going by this, and with me writing it:
"Personally, I try to avoid brands and fads as much as possible. I don't have a Facebook, Tumblr, Twitter, Instagram, or Reddit. I don't eat much fast food, or meat in general. I don't care what company made my clothes, although I would prefer it wasn't slave labor-- but that's hard to tell sometimes."

Ask any of my children & spouse and they'll tell you "If she had her way NOTHING would have a tag or lable on it."

TO TYLERDURDEN, we are undeniably a messed up nation as a whole, and yes, arrogant. Clarify the reasons behind your posting.

reply

Lol, I'm not quite that extreme. @ no tags

I'm 20 years old. One of my professors commented on how millennials are the most cosseted, sheltered generation to date, or something; that was after most of the class admitted to having their lunches made by their parents through high school.

reply

Well then, you're much like my youngest daughter. She has a sensible head on her shoulders, or mature for her age, if you prefer.

reply

Thanks, I think. xD

reply

The earliest resource a human uses in life is the ability of recognition. Since we have switched roles in regards to surviving by adapting our environment to us rather than vice versa our instincts have been debauched and misguided.

reply

I am Jack's diatribe.

reply

I chose not to choose life...

reply

That is a lot of copy and pasting. It's hard to read because the format keeps changing and the spacing is kind of messed up. Artifacts from the different sources that you copied from. Also it seems to change focus halfway through, from branding to sustainability, which is really two completely different subjects. There are some good points in there, but maybe work on cleaning up the presentation.

reply

Make Copy Pasting illegal then

reply

Is having laws against things the only way to make you not do a thing?
One time when my niece was little I took her for a walk and we went on a pedestrian overpass over the freeway. I told her to never throw anything off , even something as small as a penny, because if it landed on a car, it could cause an accident and could hurt or kill people. I was trying to teach her empathy and thinking about consequences of our actions.
When she got home she told her father that story and he said the reason not to do it was because it was against the law and you would go to jail. More of a self-preservation motivation.
Two different mindsets I guess. I am usually thinking about how my actions will affect others. Someone else might only be driven by fear of going to jail (i.e. how it would affect themselves.).

reply

I admit I like certain brands.

reply

I do agree about grains for people rather than cattle but another big problem is pollution and its effects on wildlife. I always prefer game from the field instead of store bought but it's becoming dangerous. For several years every time I eat baby seal I become ill. So yes let's concentrate on pollution of water ways!

reply