Biden roasted for agreeing to debate Trump on Howard Stern: 'His handlers must be furious!' - Donald Trump Discussion

[–] JoWilli (15589) 20 days ago

Idiot Joe Biden announced on Howard Stern’s radio show a willingness to debate Trump! Bring it on! No teleprompter Joe! #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 20 days ago

💯 They'll probably have a wire in his ear helping him with the answers to the questions and you know the Moderator will be from CNN or MSLSD, er, MSNBC and Trump won't be given any time to answer the questions

reply

[–] Ranb (7399) 19 days ago

Biden is safe. Trump's cognitive abilities are as poor or worse than Biden's. Any debate between them would be word salad times two. Yuck.

No way Trump has the courage to debate anyone unless he is in control.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 19 days ago

Sure, that makes sense.

If one ignores all the debates he had in his past two Presidential campaigns.

reply

[–] Ranb (7399) 19 days ago

That was then, this is now. You have not noticed how much Trump has declined since then?

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/22/republican-debate-trump-skip-00112238

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 19 days ago

No, I haven't. Your link doesn't seem to be what you meant it to be...

reply

[–] Ranb (7399) 19 days ago

So you think that Trump has always been intimidated by women who menstruate? Or is it a more recent psychosis?

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 19 days ago

Nothing Trump ever said in a debate was intelligent or indicative of a strong leader. He let the other candidates do all the thinking and just said things like "wrong," "fake news," "I'm the best," "No one's smarter than me."

Ask him to say "2 Corinthians," and he'll say "Two Corinthians," when anyone who's ever opened a Bible knows the correct way to read it is "Second Corinthians." I'm not saying a President needs to be a Christian, but I find it quite insulting that he would pretend that he actually reads the Bible or is a Christian.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 18 days ago

Trump redefined the political landscape with his choice of issues and platform planks in 2016.

It was very strong leadership.

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 18 days ago

What did he say in a debate that you found to be intelligent?

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 18 days ago

I'm not sure why you are limiting it to "debates" but, ok, the image that comes to my mind is when Trump called Biden out on his son't laptop.

And Biden LIED to the American people, telling them that it was russian disinformation, which we now know, was a lie.

That was a real issue, suppressed during the campaign, by an illegal operation of the fbi and cia.

That's huge. Wait, I mean, that's H-U-G-E-!-!-!

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7479) 18 days ago

National Enquirer

reply

[–] moviechatterer (13551) 18 days ago

oh you mean all that kool aid bullshit Trump vomited up for you that never came to anything?

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 18 days ago

No, I mean when Biden lied to the american people.

It was his son's laptop. All the sources he cited where lying FOR him.

That the dems threw his son under the bus and he took the fall like a good bagman, is not the point.

THe point is Trump told the truth, and Biden lied.

reply

[–] Yatzo (1385) 18 days ago

National enquirer

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 17 days ago

You're clearly an idiot.

reply

[–] Yatzo (1385) 17 days ago

Pecker

reply

[–] Yatzo (1385) 17 days ago

Pecker

reply

[–] Yatzo (1385) 17 days ago

Pecker

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 17 days ago

Yes, there were dic pics. There was also business information and my point was actually about the masssive coverup.

It is you lefties that want to pretend this is about dic pics, or
national enquirer,

but it is clear that BIden is corrupt, his son was his bag man, and the cia and the fbi ran an illegal joint operation to cover it up.

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 18 days ago

Well, the topic is debates, but I would not be too smug about Trump's intelligence. Please, surprise me. Find something intelligent that Trump said. Please ... anything ... anything at all!!!

And Biden LIED to the American people, telling them that it was russian disinformation, which we now know, was a lie.

He really didn't, but if you're one of those people who believes something just because Trump said it (ie, the 2020 election was stolen), there just may not be hope for you.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 17 days ago

Ziggy. Biden not only lied, but he cited the cia to support his lie.

How did Biden get the cia to support his lie when he was out of the government?

If he called them up and gave them orders, that would be illegal. If they followed those orders, that would be illegal.

So, what's up with that?

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 16 days ago

I'm not saying he didn't say it. I'm saying it wasn't a lie (because it was the truth - Russian disinformation did play a role in the 2016 Election).

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

And once again ziggy, your defense of your side, is based on you pretending to not understand simple shit.

BIDEN, THE CIA AND TEH FBI AND BIG TECH AND BIG MEDIA, were pushing the LIE that the LAPTOP was russian disinformation.

I said that several times now. Yet you are pretending that a vague statement like, "russian informatin did play a role", means shit here.

The LAPTOP was real. Trump was telling teh Truth, BIDEN was lying. DURING THE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES.

And to this day, lefties like you are still defending that lie.

WHY?

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 16 days ago

I wasn’t referring to a laptop.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

Yes, you were. The "lie" you were responding to, in post 1564, was Biden claiming that hte laptop was russian disinformation.

Ziggy, at teh time, Bidne was out of office.

So, how did he get the cia and the fbi to work for HIM instead of their actual boss, the FREAKING PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES?

Doesn't it bother you at all that the most powerful spy organization in the world, and the most power police organization in this country,

have both gone rogue?

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 16 days ago

Show proof of your claims or just let it go. Either way is fine with me.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 15 days ago

https://www.newsweek.com/biden-team-sparked-effort-kill-hunter-laptop-story-ex-cia-boss-1795950

"Morrell made the confession in private sworn testimony to the House Judiciary Committee, saying he acted after speaking to Antony Blinken, then part of the Biden campaign and now secretary of state, because he wanted Joe Biden to "win the election." "

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62688532

"Mark Zuckerberg says Facebook restricting a story about Joe Biden's son during the 2020 election was based on FBI misinformation warnings."

Did you really miss all of this?

reply

[–] moviechatterer (13551) 18 days ago

Nothing Trump ever said in a debate was intelligent or indicative of a strong leader. He let the other candidates do all the thinking and just said things like "wrong," "fake news," "I'm the best," "No one's smarter than me."

"Nothing Trump ever said ever was intelligent or indicative of a strong leader."
FTFY

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 18 days ago

Sadly, this is also true!

reply

[–] Branson26 (485) 16 days ago

Can you give a few examples of debate quotes from other politicians that were intelligent or indicative of a strong leader? I need a baseline for a fair comparison.

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 16 days ago

Can you give an example (just one example) of anything intelligent that Trump has ever said?

reply

[–] Branson26 (485) 16 days ago

I sure can. However if you can't do the same for any other politician then your thread is a complete failure.

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 16 days ago

If you can give an example of Trump's intelligence, great. I would love to see it.

"I sure can. However if you can't do the same for any other politician then your thread is a complete failure. "

That's not how it works. I claimed Trump has not made an intelligent statement.

"Nothing Trump ever said in a debate was intelligent or indicative of a strong leader."

If you would like to prove me wrong, go for it. Prove to me that Trump has said something intelligent.

reply

[–] Branson26 (485) 16 days ago

You can't give an example (just one example) of anything intelligent that another politician has said. Without a way to compare, you can just denounce any Trump quote or a quote by any politician for that matter.

This thread is a failure.

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 15 days ago

If you don't know what an intelligent statement is unless I provide an example of an intelligent statement, then my only hope is that you stay in school.

reply

[–] Branson26 (485) 15 days ago

You can't be this dumb. I don't know what you consider as an intelligent quote. You failed to make that claim. You have no argument. Again, this thread is a failure.

reply

[–] DarthAckbar (947) 18 days ago

CNN Poll: Biden wins final presidential debate

CNN
https://www.cnn.com › 2020/10/22 › politics › cnn-poll...
Oct 23, 2020 — Joe Biden did a better job in the final debate on Thursday, according to a CNN Instant Poll of debate watchers. Overall, 53% of voters who ...

Who won the debate? Audience says Biden, but most felt ...

CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › Politics
Sep 30, 2020 — In the first presidential debate between President Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden, voters who watched Tuesday night said Biden won ...

Poll: Majority of viewers say Biden won final debate

Politico
https://www.politico.com › news › 2020/10/23 › poll-fi...
Oct 23, 2020 — Joe Biden outperformed President Donald Trump in Thursday's final presidential debate, according to a new POLITICO/Morning Consult flash ...

Presidential debate: Who won the Trump-Biden clash?

BBC
https://www.bbc.com › election-us-2020-54345192
Sep 30, 2020 — On Tuesday night, on the basis of instant polls and betting markets, that man was Joe Biden - if only because his main goal was to prove to ...

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 18 days ago

So what you're basically saying is, that CNN and BBC and MSLSD and CBS News have already chosen Biden to win the debate before the debate even happens and refuse to acknowledge Trump in this, even if Trump steamrolls his ass which he will.. None of these pinhead news networks will acknowledge it

reply

[–] moviechatterer (13551) 18 days ago

#3 is really popular these days, I guess its a good all rounder

MAGA Excuse list
-Libturds control everything
-False Flag
-Fake News, MSM propaganda
-What about the other guy
-TDS
-We were only joking, it was satire

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 18 days ago

5 out of 6 you listed really are true though and the world is not a better place at the moment because if it, including this nonsense of allowing biological men to go into women's locker rooms and restrooms while claiming they're female and can do so and I'm sorry, I really am, but this shit needs to be reeled in a little bit.. Biological women NEED Boundaries folks.. They do

reply

[–] moviechatterer (13551) 18 days ago

I dont disagree with that ,
but how much of a problem is it ?
like I mean how often does this happen?
do trannies love gyms?

compared to real issues like war , poverty , crime etc

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 18 days ago

Well, as far as wars go, Joe has managed to get us into New wars no one asked for.. There's that.. And depending on how often Males walk into women's locker rooms and or restrooms really isn't the issue so much as it never should've been allowed since Day 1.. It's just not right and I really shouldn't have to explain why either..

reply

[–] Narwhale37 (738) 18 days ago

Trump is terrible at debates. His cultists wouldn't accept his performance if he wasn't their Messiah.

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 18 days ago

How is Trump terrible at debates which is liberal bullshit?? How?? Come on.. I'll play along here?? 🤔

reply

[–] Narwhale37 (738) 18 days ago

For starters he's never prepared for one.

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 18 days ago

And neither has Joe Biden without his Teleprompter along with the wire in his ear feeding him the answers, not to mention, going soft on the questions they're most noted for

reply

[–] Narwhale37 (738) 18 days ago

Here we go again with the Whataboutisms. No one said Biden was a good debater.

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 18 days ago

What's so wrong with "Whataboutism's" when in the case of Joe Biden, they stick?? 🤔

reply

[–] Narwhale37 (738) 18 days ago

It's a strawman as I just said. You asked why is Trump bad at debates, I gave an answer and then you just randomly bring in Joe Biden when had nothing to do with the question. Also you're assuming I think Joe Biden is a good debater which I never said.

reply

[–] parkerbot (5713) 18 days ago

Can you imagine the juice they'll have to inject into Biden to get him to perform at a debate?

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 18 days ago

Water should do the trick. He's very intelligent.

reply

[–] Pete314 (2472) 18 days ago

Yeah, as much as his fans... 🙄

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 18 days ago

If all you have to say is, "I know you are but what am I," then you are not exactly proving your point.

reply

[–] Pete314 (2472) 18 days ago

Sorry, but when you watch Biden in the last years and still think he is as intelligent as he might have been decades ago then there is something wrong with you. Just sayin'...

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 18 days ago

For example ...

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 18 days ago

How intelligent can a man be by allowing 20 Million people to flood into the U.S, many of which could be Terrorists and you'd never know it!!?? How intelligent is a man who allows biological men to go into a female locker room or restroom and then claim they can be there because they're female?? Just how fucking stupid are you?? 🙄 This is definitely not the United States of America I once knew, that much IS certain

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 18 days ago

20 Million people to flood into the U.S

Sure, if you only tell (less than) half the story. How many people were sent back under each administration? Once the cross, they need to be processed. Some stay and some are sent back. You're oversimplifying things.

could be Terrorists

So you're an alarmist, just like Trump. That does not speak well of your intelligence (though I am always open to you proving me wrong on that one - I actually hope you are intelligent. You've just given so much evidence to the contrary.)

As far as your statements on Transgenders, this has been on ongoing conversation for decades. It's hardly something to blame on the current President.

Why would I (a female) care if there were a male in the restroom. You do know the we use stalls, right? And there are family locker rooms, private locker rooms, private changing areas, private showers. There is really no reason for this to be an issue. You're making a mountain out of ... a spoonful of dirt???

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 18 days ago

Why would I (a female) care if there were a male in the restroom. You do know the we use stalls, right? And there are family locker rooms, private locker rooms, private changing areas, private showers. There is really no reason for this to be an issue. You're making a mountain out of ... a spoonful of dirt???

Go fuck yourself you moron.. If you end up being sexually assaulted or Raped in the locker room or stall by a male, I hope you remember this moment?? 🙄 No one in their right fucking mind you fucking tool would be all for males going in the female locker rooms or restrooms so again, FUCK OFF and it's because of your asinine post that you're now on the coveted ignore list with the rest of the liberal woke pinheads, so you know the drill dickhead:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiKXcHyGMM8

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7479) 18 days ago

You're female?!
Are you also a potty mouthed truck driver?

reply

[–] Martoto (4331) 16 days ago

Not very lady-like or American is it? I guess that's just how some parents chose to raise (or not raise) their children. Generational intelligence and decorum poverty is a tough cycle to break out of. Being a shrieking shill for a charlatan happy to manipulate that kind of stupidity is an easier alternative to helping yourself get better I suppose.

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7479) 15 days ago

The ugliest kind of MAGA is alive and well on Moviechat!

reply

[–] Ziggy (1569) 18 days ago

You seemed very threatened by anyone who disagrees with you. Why do you think that is?

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7479) 18 days ago

I disagree
It would probably go like their last debate, Trump sounding loud and stupid and Biden letting him be loud and stupid

reply

[–] Information-Police (4177) 18 days ago

What would we expect from a commentator on Fox.

Trump won't dare debate. He will remind everyone what an idiot he is. Joe will dance circles around him

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 18 days ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/laughing-goodfellas-XOywjQnU8R89q

reply

[–] Information-Police (4177) 17 days ago

You think it's funny, I guess. Trump hasn't had to face anybody who would challenge what he had said in 4 years. He had the chance in the Republican debate but chickened out. He sounds like a fool every time he opens his mouth.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 17 days ago

He was so far ahead of the pack on the gop primary that he would have elevated them by appearing on stage with them.

reply

[–] Information-Police (4177) 17 days ago

Great excuse for a coward.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 17 days ago

Question. If he had agreed to debate, would you admit he was brave?

reply

[–] Information-Police (4177) 17 days ago

He didn't though. No use pondering the what ifs

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

In the real world, we both know that you would not.

YOu don't care. You made a supposed point about Trump, and I offered the obvious counter point.

And you don't care.

This shows that you didn't care about your own point.

You just hate Trump with a fiery passion.

He could walk on water and raise the dead and you would invent something to whine about.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 16 days ago

This same thing applies to you about any liberal or Democrat. Don't get mad when people do what you do on the opposite side. If any democrat had half the scandals of Trump you wouldn't look past it.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

That is true. That is why you will rarely see me whining about something like, Biden... well really doing anything.

I try to limit my complaints about him to what my real issues with him are, ie that he hates me and mine and is working actively to hurt me and mine.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 16 days ago

Same goes for me with Trump. When he targets Kyle or my interests I will speak out. Him claiming voter fraud without solid proof is harming my interests as well as others.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

Sounds like bullshit to me.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 16 days ago

Yeah anything that doesn't go with your narrative you consider that. Tell me if he is wrong about voter fraud is that harmful to doread that lie?

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

I don't see the harm to you or your interests.

Explain it to me.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 16 days ago

Him stating that makes it to where people will not accept an election result unless their candidate wins. This causes divide, riots crime etc starts to begin. So if my guy wins it's fair, if he loses he was cheated. It seems like that's spreading the logic of a 14 year old kid on Xbox live on society. You think that's a good thing? As a leader he should show more class and respect than that. I don't support his wall either. I think there are many better things to spend money on in this country.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

Trump didn't cause that. The left didn't accept Trump winning. Nor GW winning. YOu don't remember the fag talk of hm being the APPOINTED PRESIDENT?

The people have been losing faith in our institutions.

The blame for that, lies with all the people in the institutions that have been being completely corrupt and increasingly blatant about it.

Not Trump.

Also, it is worth noting that if Trump DIDN'T do that, ie talk about the election, you would still hate him. That is not your reason for hating him. It is just a club you think you can use against him and his supporters.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 16 days ago

I didn't say he started it. He is is sure fanning that flame though. That only adds onto that type of mentality. I never argued them winning even though I think Bush is a despicable war criminal. He won and I accept it. You conservatives won't be that civil. Am I saying liberal will no but you act just like any of them you hate do.

You are talking shit. I dislike Trump and I have many more reasons to dislike him than just those things I stated. You wouldn't like a Democrat no matter what they did either so spare me the bullshit please.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

1. Our institutions ARE decaying and declining. Trump talking about it, is not the problem.

2. so, like I said, this isn't really an issue for you. Y ou hate him regardless.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 16 days ago

But it doesn't help it either.

He adds to the issue.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

iF are institutions are not trustworthy,

and they clearly are not.

Then NOT trusting them is not the problem.

The problem is that our institutions have been corrupted or weaponized.

INdeed, it is BETTER that people know, instead of being stupid bitches, that fall for the lies of vile assholes.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 16 days ago

Funny then why is it only corrupt when it goes against him? Would he argue for his opposition if they were cheated?

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

That's a strange question that assumes some strange things and ignores... a lot.

Meanwhile, my point stands.

NOT trusting them is not the problem.

The problem is that our institutions have been corrupted or weaponized.

INdeed, it is BETTER that people know, instead of being stupid

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 16 days ago

Your point got demolished by that question. Why is the system trusted when their candidate wins? If it's truly untrustworthy it would be questioned no matter who wins. If Trump wins he won fair and square if he loses he was cheated. That literally decimated your entire point. So no I'm afraid it doesn't stand.

People should know but either the system is trustworthy or it isn't. You don't get to have it both ways.

reply

[–] moviechatterer (13551) 16 days ago

A maga will literally just reverse that idea like a child in the playground saying " no you're stoopid"

They will ,amazingly, without a hint of irony, claim that calling an election cheated if they lose is a democrat thing.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 15 days ago

Oh trust me I know how dumb they are. Corbell is a special kind of dumb though.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 15 days ago

Your question reveals a level of stupid that is beyond belief.

In that I don't believe you.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 15 days ago

So then that's you conceding then. Thanks for that point. Is this a conservative thing to give away free points like that? Address the hypocrisy or else that counts as another loss on your end.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 15 days ago

When a biased source says or does something that benefits that or who it is biased towards, that behavor is suspect.

Such as a thugs mother claiming her son is a "good boy". Who the fuck puts any stock in that? Only retards.

ON the other hand, if a biases source is forced to admit something that HURTS the one(s) they are biased towards, then that is more credible.

Only a fucking retard would need this explained to them.

THe way that you gloated, because you were pretending to not know this?

My god, the english language cannot describe how fucking stupid you are pretending to be.

What a fag you are.

reply

[–] Grifterhunter (707) 15 days ago

You conceded this point bud. You are fine with the system so long as it favors your party. When it doesn't you then question it. You talk a good game but get crushed under any form of scrutiny.

You lost today kid but that doesn't mean you have to like it.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 15 days ago

OMG. Your level of retard is beyond belief.

reply

[–] Information-Police (4177) 16 days ago

I'm not going to call anyone brave for mearly doing what everyone is expected to do.

reply

[–] Corbell (8734) 16 days ago

Well, I certainly expected you to NOT address any of the points I raised.

reply

[–] Freddy (1318) 16 days ago

I wonder what BKB stands for; any way has trump ever been on Stern? word be a really good show each one trying to be the star

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 16 days ago

BKB simply stands for my 1st, middle and last name.. Keep it simple

reply

[–] BKB (6432) 16 days ago

Howard Stern has been quoted as saying, that of all the interviews he's conducted in his Career, that Donald Trump was the most fascinating because he admired the man for telling it like it is.. That was 1994-1999.. Now, in 2024, Stern is such a Liberal pinhead who's completely against the man and only because of not wanting to offend his fanbase, for a man who never has to work ever again and has around $500 Million to his name??

reply