MovieChat Forums > The Office (2005) Discussion > They miss the only qualified manger to r...

They miss the only qualified manger to replace Michael


Why they didn't pick Oscar?

He is the smarter and the only normal person in the office.

reply

Didn't you just both answer your own question AND contradict yourself at the same time?

How is an anti-Michael going to be 'qualified' to replace Michael? It's like saying satan would be the perfect, most qualified replacement for The Christ. You are making no sense.

Oscar is an annoying, self-important, humorless douchebag, a pretentious snob-wannabe that thinks he's more valuable than anyone else. His face is ugly, his speaking voice is irritating, his tone is monotone, and he is the most BORING character besides Toby.

How the F would this guy ever replace Michael? He doesn't have Michael's expertise and experience, he doesn't have enough quirkiness, he has no personality to speak of, he doesn't have a big heart the way Michael does.

This guy is all brain and contempt, no warmth or humorous quirks.

Oscar would be the worst guy to replace anyone but some egotistical jerk who doesn't quite understand just how useless and annoying he is.

The only thing more annoying than Oscar is andy bernard.

I thought you were going to say Jim Carrey, because he did appear in one episode.

Replacing Michael Scott or Steven Carell is like replacing Charlie and Charlie Sheen in Two and a Half Men - it can't be done.

reply