MovieChat Forums > BeaSouth
BeaSouth (2829)
MovieChat Contributor
Posts
Happy Mother’s Day to All The Gals of MovieChat
Cringeworthy Message Even for 1987
Surprised this is the First Comment on this Great Movie
Pros and Cons & Strange Use of Alec Baldwin
Justin Salinger and Ta-Nehisi Coates
So Much Missed Potential
Bridge Collapse in Baltimore - Mass Casualty Event
A Story that Needed to Be Told
Accused of Plagiarism
Quirky But Watchable Heist Movie
View all posts >
Replies
I see them on movies I watch on Amazon Prime. When the trend began I thought it would really annoy me. But it’s pretty low key on Prime and like the terms and conditions before an online purchase, they become so ubiquitous that you stop even seeing them. I heard a comedian talking about knowing he was in for a good movie based on the number of trigger warnings announced before it started.
I’ve tried this with him. Many others have as well. He once deleted his Allaby account when he was heavily condemned. Then he found that several well intended legacy posters like sslssg and Kowalski would come to his defense with the “it’s all relative” and “he’s never really crossed a red line” arguments. This has only emboldened him.
Now he provokes by raising the child nudity issue whenever he gets the chance. He gets excited discussing it, making people angry, and then basking in the support of a handful of high-count posters willing to take up for him. It’s really sad. I got fed up when I saw people on FilmBoards talking about how Allaby had secured a comfortable spot on MovieChat to express his child lover sentiments. A few days ago he was posting about how much he loves “LGs” (his euphemism for little girls) and how hard it is for him not to post about them.
It was obscure movie called Sexuele voorlichting. I only know about it because a poster named Saskia alerted me about it before quitting MovieChat in disgust with the incessant child lover musings of BrandNewPoster (then known as Allaby before deleting his account):
<blockquote><b>Sexuele voorlichting (movie):</b> “This sex education film provides the expected information for youth entering puberty (see keywords), but does so in an explicit manner. There are no innocuous line drawings but rather abundant nudity.”
<b>Allaby:</b> 2 years ago
“[To OP]: it sounds interesting. How is it?”
<b>[Saskia]:</b> a year ago
“Of course it sounds interesting to you. I'd almost swear [OP] was an alternative account of yours given the similar interests but then I remember how many Allaby's are in this world. Yuck!”
<b>Allaby:</b> a year ago
“To be clear, it sounds interesting in a weird way, not in a sexual or perverse way. I like some weird movies and I'm mildly curious how this film would be done. I have a variety of interests and I post about a lot of different topics, unlike [OP] who only posts about underage nudity/sexuality.”</blockquote>
I absolutely accept your point in that regard Breeze. I’m not objecting to it at all. But again, we don’t explore dangerous jungles or the deepest oceans unprepared or send astronauts to Mars in swimsuits. But that’s essentially what we saw of the aliens in Signs. They had made no apparent preparations for the Earth environment. That’s the part I still felt was silly about the movie.
There are no assumptions. My condemnation is based on his specific and explicit words in his posts (with which you and many others have likewise taken issue at times in the past). I don’t know what he said to get you to invest your name as his now unwavering defender but his posts below reinforce that he has problems and he enjoys the attention and the willingness of several credible high-count posters to take up his case. I have turned a blind eye to him many times but he relentlessly provokes by posting on this issue. I personally had enough when he enthusiastically publicized his interest in the European child puberty movie, and its Imdb description of explicit child nudity. Just like the posters you criticize who incessantly talk about naked women in movies, he deserves to be confronted and rejected for his endless focus on naked kids.
Yes and he never stops talking about it. People reference him on other movie sites as a child lover. He gets titillated by starting threads and posts about it, getting people riled up, and then seeing Kowalski and other legacy posters parachute in and defend him. It makes him feel popular and reinforced. I asked him one time if he ever talked about his love of movies with child nudity to his buddies at the pub or around work like he does here. No response
Not the same thing. This “good dude” searches out child nudity and erotica in movies and then provokes people with endless posts about it. You are the first to criticize threads where people objectify women on this site but you repeatedly undermine your credibility by taking up his defense which he doesn’t deserve.
Still I’d think it a deterrent when the life form they found was also made up of water and could merely spit on them or throw a dixie cup of urine to cause fatal injury. The story might have at least explained why the aliens needed to take such a mortal risk without any apparent preparation considering the vulnerability. The images we saw of the aliens and this weakness were akin to landing astronauts on Mars in their swim trunks
Love to hear a mom-ism like “boom cars.” Glad you had a nice day GE. You always paint a picture with your posts!
Non-binary sexual attraction equates to being a “weido.” Good to know that’s where the BourbonKing stands on the subject. You’re really enlightened
View all replies >