Skavau reaches 10000!
its party time! and peanut butter jelly TIME!
π₯π₯π₯π₯π₯
BEST PERSON I KNOW...A TRUE FRIEND....I TOTALLY LOVE THAT GIRL.π₯°
so he is now a girl. I knew he was one of them damn trans freaks.
sharewe shall never know!
sharewhy did she leave the board again? son of a bitch!
shareOh no
I
h
a
v
e
a
f
e
e
l
I
n
g
t
h
a
t
t
h
I
s
t
h
r
e
a
d
i
s
g
o
i
n
g
t
o
t
u
r
n
i
n
t
o
.
.
.
.
.
T
H
I
S!
!
!
π±
π±
π±
It probably has something to do with the lashing it has been receiving in this thread lately:
https://moviechat.org/tt31433814/Doctor-Who/66464c69267af721f3095705/Blacklisting
We could use this thread to keep track of the threads he's currently being brutalized in. Oh sorry...I meant "she"
shareWhat amazing arguments were put to me in that thread that I simply could not refute?
Or are you of the opinion the murderous fascist who made that thread somehow has a point?
A
n
d
a
w
a
y
w
e
g
o
.
.
.
.
.
!
!
!
LOL so it begins.
shareWelcome to 1000 questions! haha
shareThe Interrogator of MovieChat
shareOne of them. It would be hilarious to see a list of all the questions asked in a single week by BennyMuso and Skavau turned into one of those word cloud pictures.
sharePerhaps if people didn't make ridiculous claims on here that are obviously utterly batshit, I wouldn't feel inclined to ask for some sort of sourcing.
Keep in mind the user you're replying to claims that Obama had 3 gay lovers as a fact. And that the military handpicked Trump to run for office, but watched as the 2020 vote was mired in fraud and did nothing.
Talking to Skavau is like talking to an AI chatbot. It's so exhausting. But I did finally manage to get a rise out of them with my reactionary politics. So at least now we know they have emotions. Definitely got to be on the spectrum though.
shareYou mean your actual fascist politics.
I've always talked to fascists like they are shit on my shoe.
I've always talked to fascists like they are shit on my shoe.
Funny, I feel the same way about you. Just a subhuman piece of shit. share
You want to censor me and destroy my life. I'm just rude to you on an internet forum because you want to do that to me (and others).
We are not the same.
I don't want to censor you. I want everyone to hear what you have to say.
Besides, you said you're not Woke. So you're not even going to be rounded up let alone killed. What are you crying about? Stop whining.
In your ideal world, I would be censored. And all 'woke' people would be persecuted or killed.
So yes you do.
>Besides, you said you're not Woke. So you're not even going to be rounded up let alone killed. What are you crying about? Stop whining.
Could I make arguments about social or political issues that would be considered 'woke' by you? Or would your Saudi Arabian style morality police kick my door down?
In my ideal world, you would not be censored. You would simply be treated like a piece of shit. Which you are.
Same thing goes for the Wokes. I simply want them marginalized. I want them to be pariahs. Outcasts. Like they used to be.
>In my ideal world, you would not be censored. You would simply be treated like a piece of shit. Which you are.
Which means what, in practice?
>Same thing goes for the Wokes. I simply want them marginalized. I want them to be pariahs. Outcasts. Like they used to be.
And when was this?
Also, this just isn't true. You just said you want them institutionalised into labour camps.
I'll give you a real world example. How are Nazis or racists treated in the world today (in liberal circles)?
They are marginalized, fired from their jobs, looked down upon, discriminated against. Called pieces of shit by people like you. They are social outcasts.
That is what I want the Wokes to be. I want them treated the way we treat Nazis today. Except minus the online censorship. I don't want them censored online.
>I'll give you a real world example. How are Nazis or racists treated in the world today (in liberal circles)?
Oh, you mean cancelled?
I thought you hated cancel culture.
>That is what I want the Wokes to be. I want them treated the way we treat Nazis today. Except minus the online censorship. I don't want them censored online.
So how on earth would you enforce that? Nazis and fascists are banned from online forums online.
Nazis actually want to harm people. There's no correlation between than and a 'wokist'.
I thought you hated cancel culture.
I do. That is why I want to punish the cultural left and let them suffer the same fate.
In the same way we give the death penalty to serial murderers.
Once again, this is a Popper's Paradox in action. A variation on a theme: By cancelling the cancelers we are cancelling cancel culture. share
>I do. That is why I want to punish the cultural left and let them suffer the same fate.
Should private companies and individuals and online forums have the right to ban people from accessing their spaces?
>Once again, this is a Popper's Paradox in action. A variation on a theme: By cancelling the cancelers we are cancelling cancel culture.
No, you're just maintaining it - but flipping it.
And again: You apparently reject the right of private groups to choose who may enter their spaces. You want "wokes" treated the same way as Nazis are treated now, but minus the "online censorship". That can only mean you want to force sites like Reddit, Discord, Facebook, wherever to host them.
Should private companies and individuals and online forums have the right to ban people from accessing their spaces?
If I were having this conversation with a normal person in earnest, I would tell them that this is a very complex topic and would depend on the company, the online spaces, and all sorts of other considerations. It would be a long and tedious conversation.
Short answer, Yes. Longer answer, No, but..
However since I'm not talking to a normal person, but instead an exhausting, joy draining, subhuman autist, whom I don't take seriously, I simply don't respect you enough to answer you earnestly. share
>If I were having this conversation with a normal person in earnest, I would tell them that this is a very complex topic and would depend on the company, the online spaces, and all sorts of other considerations. It would be a long and tedious conversation.
I don't give a flying fuck. I'll take your refusal to elaborate as an inability to do so without contradicting yourself regarding civil liberties, or free speech or freedom of association. Because you're not clever enough and have thought nothing out beyond "woke bad".
>However since I'm not talking to a normal person, but instead an exhausting, joy draining, subhuman autist, whom I don't take seriously, I simply don't respect you enough to answer you earnestly.
"Normal people" apparently being people who suck up to fascists, in your mind.
Take my refusal anyway you want you tard. You've just demonstrated that you're not interested in the truth. You're not interested in actually listening to people. You're just going to believe what you want to believe regardless is if it's true or not. No amount of sophistry is going to hide the fact that you are just a pathetic midwit. You talk so much, but you've got nothing to say. Nothing of value.
Your opinions are as vapid as a stagnant pool.
What "truth" am I not interested in?
I read what you say. It's mostly hateful garbage. But I read what you say.
What is it I believe, exactly?
What? Sorry, you're breaking up...
shareBack to you behaving like a 10 year old again, I see.
shareHello? Are you there?
sharewhat makes him a fascist?
sharePosts like this:
https://moviechat.org/tt31433814/Doctor-Who/66464c69267af721f3095705/Blacklisting?reply=6646713877f7d35412fa3fe2
https://moviechat.org/tt31433814/Doctor-Who/66464c69267af721f3095705/Blacklisting?reply=6646775477f7d35412fa4019
https://moviechat.org/tt31433814/Doctor-Who/66464c69267af721f3095705/Blacklisting?reply=66467d6977f7d35412fa4057
I think he's saying that to get a rise out of you. I doubt he really holds those beliefs.
shareI mean he initially replied to capuchin and said it. Not me.
Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. But he is 100% presenting as a fascist.
You know those gender fluid freaks who think they are a she/her one day and then he/him the other day depending on the weather?
That's me, except with fascism. Sometimes I'm just your friendly neighborhood socialist and other times I'm a your friendly neighborhood National Socialist
You know, like an Almond Joy.
How do 10 year olds behave?
Do you have evidence for your assertions of how 10 year olds behave?
Is that biased source the only evidence you are providing?
Why did you arbitrarily choose the people of the age of 10; do you have some underlying bias towards 10 year olds?
Do you realize that labeling 10 year olds in such a fashion makes you a racist, fascist, alt-right bigot?
I think you are misapplying the word see; can you provide a source for the meaning that of the word that you are implying here?
What do you mean by the word back?
Where is your evidence that this has happened before?
Cute satire. It's based on an evaluation of his behaviour. Perhaps some people genuinely think pretending not to hear someone in a comment chain constitutes adult behaviour. I don't.
Claims like "Barack Obama had 3 gay lovers" as certain other users have made however, or "Lady Gaga is Jewish" do suggest good reason to ask for evidence.